Assessment of The Satisfaction Tendency Toward Different Prosthodontic Treatments’ Modalities

Monia MN Kandil


Aims: To evaluate and compare the denture satisfaction tendencies for and between the completely and
partially edentulous patients, with different treatment’s modalities.
Materials and Methods: The study was conducted to include twenty eight patients were fit to the criteria of the research, asked
to answer some questions reflect their satisfaction with the newly received dentures, which were delivered to patients according
to their conditions and needs (complete removable denture, conventional metal frame RPD, RPD with flexible Valplast clasps, and
RPD with attachments).
Results: The data collected from these patients was grouped and the questioners values were calculated to estimate the most
satisfied group, which was seen with the group received RPD had Valplast esthetic clasps; But the significant difference analyzed
by Mann-Whitney Test, was focused on the satisfaction of prostheses’ appearance, that was clearly revealed for the patients who
received RPD with resilient attachments; followed by the group who received complete dentures, and RPD with Valplast clasp (at
the same level), supported by the family and friends positive opinions. Also the same group that received RPD with attachments
achieved optimum level in prosthesis’ satisfaction for retention.
Conclusions: The results of this research directed the attention to the recent treatment modalities in construction dentures,
like using flexible esthetic Valplast material and attachments; the patients that received RPD with tooth like color Valplast clasps
appeared to be more satisfied with their prostheses, mostly this was related to the comfortability, esthetic and retention traits,
followed with group that received RPD with attachments that showed significant differences in esthetic and retention scores than
other groups. While the Complete denture wearers were the less satisfied group, related obviously to the difficulty to gain the
retention in relation to the partial once, as well as the uncomfortable feelings.


Denture satisfaction; Satisfaction scale; Valplast clasp; extra-coronal attachment; Removable partial denture (RPD)satisfaction

Full Text:



Narain U, Garg R, Sameer A, Narain P (2009) A Prospective

Study Of The Quality Of Removable Prostheses And

Patients’ Satisfaction In Post-Prosthetic Phase. In J Dent

Sc; 9 (1): 5.

Kaplan R, Saccuzzo D (2005) Psychological Testing-

Principles, Applications, and Issues. 6th Ed., Thomson

Wadsworth; Pp: 138-40, 475-507.

Davis D, Fiske J, Scott B, Radford DR (2000) The emotional

effects of tooth loss: a preliminary quantitative study. Br

Dent J; 188: 503-8.

Hichey J, Zarb G, Bolender C (1990) Prosthodontic treatment

for edentulous patients. 9th Ed, India/ CBS publisher; Pp:

Basker R, Davenport J (2002) Prosthetic Treatment of

the Edentulous Patient. 4th Ed., Blackwell Munksgaard

puplisher; Pp: 1- 37.

Steele JG, Treasure E, Pitts NB Morris J, Bradnock G (2000)

Total tooth loss in the united Kingdom in 1998 and its

implications for the future. Br Dent J; 189:598-601.

Zarb G, Bolender C, Carlsson G (1997) Boucher’s

Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients. 11th

edition, Mosby; P: 57.

Kandil M (2012) Evaluation of the Supporting Structures

for Three Modalities of Bilateral Distal Extension Partial

Dentures. PH.D. Thesis; Faculty of Oral and Dental

Medicine/Cairo University.

Celebić A, Knezović-Zlatarić (2003) A comparison of

patient’s satisfaction between complete and partial

removable denture wearers. J Dent; 31(7): 445-51.

Soliman G (2007) Bilateral Versus Unilateral Stabilization

Using Extra-coronal Attachment for Kennedy Class II

“Stress Analysis Study”. M.Sc. Thesis; Faculty of Oral and

Dental Medicine, Cairo University.

Deluca A (2007) The unique thermoplastic injected partial-

Flexite. Dent Lab Summer; 1: 48-50.

Negrutiu M, Sinescu C, Sticlaru C, Davidescu A and Romanu

M (2007) The analysis of removable partial dentures with

clasp made from thermoplastic and chemoplastic materials:

A biomechanical approach of the interface between clasp

and denture. Europ Cells and Mater; 13: 20-26.

Qasim M (2009) A Comparison between Flexible and

Conventional Removable Partial Denture. Hi.D. Thesis;

College of Dentistry, Mosul University.

Goiato M, Santos D, Haddad M and Pesqueira A (2010)

Effect of accelerated aging on the micro-hardness and

color stability of flexible resins for dentures. Braz Dent J;

: 1-9.

Jenkins G (1999) Precision Attachments: A Link to

Successful Restorative Treatment. Quintessence Publishing

Co., Inc., Chicago; Pp: 9-21, 55-73.

DiTolla M (2004) Valplast Flexible esthetic partial dentures,

hair-side perspective. Clinc techn and proced; 5: 1-5.

Shakal E (2001) Comparative evaluation of RPI and

extracoronal attachment designs used for mandibular

distal extension prosthesis using clinical- radiographic and

stress analysis. Egypt Dent Assoc; 47: 3-8.

Rhein 83 technical manual (2002-2003) Attachments and

Prefabricated Castable Components. Rhein- Bolonga,

Italy. Pp: 5-15, 37.



  • There are currently no refbacks.